…or the democrats will have won.
why should the nutroots have all the fun? there’s still a battle to
be fought on the local level with very worthy candidates. i’ve heard
the opposing arguments, and they ring hollow. the stakes are too high
to act like spoiled children when we don’t get exactly what we want.
why did the conservatives turn out for bush in 2004? was it because of
his committment to fiscal discipline? was it because we knew that he
would take care of the illegal immigration problem once and for all? of
course not. so why are we acting as if someone tricked us? the 2004
election was about iraq, the war on terror, and judicial appointments.
those were issues we cared about then. aren’t they still important? the
jury’s still out on iraq, but in those other two areas bush has been
exactly what we expected. if we put democrats in charge, the whole
country will suffer negative consequences, not just those republicans
who have stepped off of the reservation. we will reverse programs that
ARE working to try to gain an elusive ideological purity that will
never be possible in any party. just something to consider.
there are some conservatives still in the republican party. some of
them are incumbents running for re-election. some of them are
challenging democratic incumbents, which is also an uphill battle. if
you are lucky enough to have a conservative representing you in
congress who is running for re-election, please don’t sit on the
sidelines. do what you can to help them win. all campaigns would
appreciate whatever time you can spare, even if it’s only an hour or
two. not all of us can donate money,
but there are other ways to show our support for those who agree with
us on the important issues we are facing in this country.
last night i went to a debate between congressman john spratt (who
currently represents south carolina’s district 5) and his conservative
republican challenger, local businessman ralph norman. it was great fun
to watch. it was also hard to decide who won. the important thing in
this debate was that it was a debate about ideas. there were a couple
pelosi references and bush references, but i believe that the audience
got to hear a clear difference between spratt and norman on policy. i
doubt any hearts and minds were changed there, however, since virtually
everybody had already decided who they would support before this debate
started.
for the record, i have done some unpaid campaign work for
norman, and my family has as well. i support ralph norman because he’s
the right guy for district 5, not because he’s paying for my
endorsement. congressman john spratt is a decent fellow, i’m
sure of that, but he has opposed just about everything the people in
this district support. for that reason, we should let him get on with
the business of retiring after this election. 
related:
you can’t always get what you want
Conservatives Will Regret Putting Dems in Power-tony blankley (RCP)
A Blank Check from America?–thomas sowell (RCP)
tags: ‘06 election, john spratt, ralph norman